CO129-534-9 Law of Piracy- case of Rex v. Chung Tam Kwong 1-4-1931 - 20-4-1932 — Page 52

C. O.

Mr.

Mr.

Mr.

Mr. Tomlinson.

Sir C. Bottomley.

Sir J. Shuckburgh.

Sir G. Grindle.

Permt. U.S. of S.

Parly. U.S. of S.

Secretary of State.

DRAFT.

The Malia could, flour,

Temented

h

an Act

be packliffor

Parliament, but has Lorvaled fanfield feets Soome difficult in affroaching Pach on so far reaching a festhem meechy on accous Judgment if the Court

HK. Mich If the suspencer transi

H

To be confirmed to

Council the Way wrong

grily

Wile floun the difficut woksterw.

is

bgh

reas cannot be

conoréted of procian in

IHK unless they

Cers they actually

Comment robbery at the

same time. In view of the

frequency I firatical attacks

in the China reas

the sas

the Spinion that, th

брей

in atters are

as a result

that, it if

left as they are

of the is fidquent,

be chiar for thoumissing it will create a serious fine, the enter thinks sit nation and

a Bile lot and

# L

it is very desirable that a at heal who he brought if

it is tossible. He realizo

lad

He will therefore & hill be

Cad to receive it as Carly udati as

the serious difficulties itte quero Cordshify Strous

the obsom of the Bd of Trade

way of obtaining to apical but if it was pencials thought desi velle, he would affroach the

ations Sencial

intuluater.

on/

Jossible

52